Traditional brick and mortar retailers and online retailers currently operate under two different tax scenarios that create an unbalanced competitive environment. While brick and mortar stores must collect state and local sales taxes, online operators are not required to collect these taxes unless they have a physical presence in the state. This difference in tax collection requirement can give e-retailers a significant price advantage before any other competitive factors come into play.
In 1992, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Quill Corp. v. Heitkamp (504 U.S. 298) that a company must have a physical presence in a state – often referred to as “nexus” – in order for that state to require the company to collect sales taxes. The sales taxes are still technically owed to the state, but the decision limited the states’ ability to collect from remote retailers. The ruling also explicitly found that Congress could overrule this decision by passing legislation to authorize states to collect sales taxes. The Quill decision has governed the development of e-commerce over the last twenty years, and – in the absence of Congressional action – its finding that a company must have nexus in order to be required to collect sales taxes has limited the ability of states to treat brick and mortar and online retailers equally.
FMI supports legislative action to create a level playing field for brick and mortar retailers and urges Congress to pass e-fairness legislation.
Are You Ready For the Digital Food Shopper?
What Makes a Great Store Manager?
Shaping Our Policy Priorities for the Year
Tax Talk: Border Adjustment Tax
» Facts & Figures
Get a daily briefing on top stories in food retailing, FREE.
© 2017 Food Marketing Institute. All rights reserved.
2345 Crystal Drive, Suite 800,
Arlington, VA 22202
Association Web Design and Development by Matrix Group International, Inc. ®